Stressed Out Teens

A report by the American Academy of Pediatrics shows that more and more teenagers are being sidelined by anxiety and depression. This is due to their every increasingly busy lifestyle, mainly preparing themselves for college. There is more and more pressure on students to do well in school, participate in extracurricular activities, be involved in their community, and perform well on SAT’s. The Admissions departments at colleges admit that there is a lot of pressure on teenagers to prepare themselves for college, and they have a great deal of competition. Doctors are seeing physical signs of the stress that these kids are dealing with, like stomach pains, chest pains, and headaches. Many students begin getting bombarded with college application deadlines and scheduling SAT’s during the first few weeks of their senior year in high school. According to some people, these kids are now suffering in their ability to be imaginative due to their hectic schedules. They do not have any down time to just think about whatever they want. This pressure to do well isn’t just in high school. It often starts in grade school as parents try to prepare their kids for high school activities. The kids are told that they have to be involved in school activities, do well academically, and find other activities in the community to get involved in. This is all in preparation to look impressive on their college application later on. The big problem here is that these kids no longer have the opportunity to do what they really should be doing – being kids.
(See http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6221872 for source article.)

Oil is like a strawberry field

The world’s oil supply is like a “U-pick-it” strawberry field. The early morning pickers have the best selection, and will get the easiest, biggest strawberries. The latecomers will have a harder time finding the good ones, and they will be smaller. This is similar to the way that the world’s oil production is playing out. At first, it was easy drilling and the supply was abundant. After a while, it became harder to find those free-flowing wells. We now have to dig deeper and harder, but are finding less and less oil. This strawberry field analogy is how a Swedish professor of physics, Kjell Aleklett, puts it, as reported by the Vancouver Sun. Even the Houston Chronicle is reporting the “Oil Crunch”. A Chronicle editorial had warned that global oil production would peak in this decade or next, and now a study performed by the U.S. Department of Energy is agreeing. The study was led by Robert Hirsch, a consultant and former government official overseeing research into renewable energy. He is predicting peak oil could come within the next five years, and almost certainly by 2020. The study recommends a 20 year lead time to develop alternative energy sources to replace the dwindling oil supply. However, we may not have 20 years left. Right now the world consumes 82 million barrels of oil per day. The United States Energy Information Agency projects consumption to increase to 103 million barrels per day by 2015, and 119 million barrels a day by 2025. The problem is that global production would have to increase by 45% just to keep up with demand, and no one can assure us where all this extra oil will come from.
Right now gas prices are on a downswing. Some feel that this means that peak oil was just a fabrication by a few loony scientists. Well, the world is running out of oil. It is just a matter of when. The falling gas prices can be attributed to economic slowdown and a surplus of oil reserves at the moment. Many were expecting more turbulence in the Middle East and natural disasters, meaning hurricanes, that never really materialized over the summer. So, the oil companies are left with a bunch of oil and not a whole lot of demand. It would be in the human race’s best interest to begin learning how to live without the abundance of cheap oil. If we begin now, we can wean ourselves slowly. If we wait too long, it will be a big kick in the head. Simply hoping for “alternative energy” is not the solution. The real solution is learning to do with less. This means reducing automobile travel, reducing our consumption of plastic products, and re-localizing our economy. And, we cannot wait until the government takes charge of this situation; it needs to start with the people.

Chemicals within us, and is there a balance?

Just read an article on National Geographic’s web site (http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0610/feature4/index.html) by David Ewing Duncan who had himself tested for 320 chemicals that may be lurking in his body. There are not too many places that will do this type of testing, so he had the tests done in Canada. Turns out he had quite a few chemicals in him. Some he attributed to playing near a landfill when he was kid. But, the landfill was just upstream from a municipal water supply, so the likelihood that some chemicals leeched into the water is pretty high. We seem to pick up chemicals from just about everywhere and from everything. The most striking piece of data was the amount of a chemical used as a flame retardant, PBDE, found in his body. The doctor working with him was trying to figure out what Duncan might be exposed to on a regular basis that may be the source for this. Their best guess was frequently flying on commercial airlines. Flame retardant is used on the plastics and fabrics in planes. It also seems that this chemical has turned up in literally every place on Earth. It ends up in animals hundreds or thousands of miles from anything that may have been treated with it. What this story does not mention is the potential synergistic effects that chemicals can have on the body. This is talked about quite a bit in a book called “The Hundred-Year Lie” by Randall Fitzgerald. No one really knows what happens when several of these chemicals accumulate in your body and decide to have a big party. Think the government or some food or drug agency is testing this stuff? Not a chance. They don’t even test most of the chemicals as it is, much less for how they may interact with each other.

Today there was also a news story (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/healthnews.php?newsid=52253) that the World Health Organization was going to begin spraying DDT indoors in areas of constant and high malaria infestation. It is not classified as an epidemic, but there does seem to be a high number of cases. Here we have a situation where we have a known toxic chemical that can cause health problems for humans, but, it seems to be about the only option to rid the area of malaria. Malaria can wreak quite a bit of havoc itself, so is treating the area with DDT a good compromise? Many people feel that if DDT is applied correctly it will rid the mosquitoes, thus stopping the spread of malaria while not causing any health problems in humans or other animals. Hopefully they are correct. Is the potential for health risks down the road worth the benefit of ridding an area of a killing disease like malaria? What about the use of the flame retardant? How many lives are saved each year because something didn’t go up in flames? Is that worth the price of potentially numerous health related issues later on?

“Organic” – the new catch phrase

There seems to be a lot more “organic” food available at the grocery stores lately. “Organic” is the new “low-fat” or “sugar-free”. The food vendors certainly have caught on to the evolving trend from consumers that are seeking out an alternative to synthesized artificially flavored pesticide laced foods. While it is encouraging to see this trend in America, we as consumers need to be careful in distinguishing between the true organic foods out there and the marketing gimmicks disguised as “organic” just to sell more junk. You can even buy organic food items at Wal-Mart now. Let’s see what “organic” is really about. According to the site soilassociation.org, organic farming has 3 main features: 1) it severely restricts the use of artificial fertilizers and pesticides, 2) organic farmers rely on developing healthy, fertile soil and growing a mixture of crops, 3) animals are raised without the routine use of drugs, antibiotics and wormers. The USDA.gov web site has some guidelines for the organic labeling. If an item has the “USDA ORGANIC” label on it, it has been certified to be at least 95 percent organic. If the product says “made with organic ingredients” on the front label then it contains at least 70 percent organic ingredients. If the product contains less than 70 percent organic ingredients, it will list the specific organic ingredients on the side panel of the item. Only the term “organic” is certified. Words like “natural” apply only to labeling meat and poultry as defined by the federal Agriculture Department. In their case, natural means no artificial or synthetic ingredients, including added hormones, and minimally processed. But “natural” really means nothing for the rest of the foods we buy. Just about every food item has some form of something natural in it somewhere. It has nothing to do with it being organic. A web site worth checking into as a consumer is Organic Consumers Association (organicconsumers.org). They keep an eye on the organic industry and help decipher some of the confusion. There is another certification organization called “Certified Naturally Grown’ (naturallygrown.org). It is a non-profit alternative certification program tailored for small-scale, direct-market organic farmers. The CNG certification standards are based on the USDA Organic Standards, but CNG is not accredited by or affiliated with the USDA. CNG helps with small farmers earning less than $5000 a year who cannot afford the high USDA Organic certification fees and mounds of paperwork. It can be said that the CNG organization holds more true to the organic standards than the USDA. The USDA Organic certified farms tend to be more of the “factory farm” types. These are often owned by large corporations, who many would argue are driven more by profits than consumer and environmental health. CNG certified farmers tend to be smaller, locally owned farms. Their produce will probably be purchased at farmers markets or small specialty grocery stores. For now, the organic world is still very much “buyer beware”.

The food you are eating is only as good as the dirt it growed in

(http://www.newstarget.com/020072.html)
You are trying to eat healthy, making sure to buy plenty of fresh fruits and vegetables. After all, if you are eating your fruits and vegetables, you are getting most of your vitamins and minerals, right? Well, maybe not. Here is something that I just learned: plants can make vitamins, but not minerals. The only way that plants get minerals in them is to absorb them from the soil they grow in. So, if you buy some kale thinking that you are getting a good supply of calcium (since that what we are told), you really are only getting as much calcium as the kale could absorb from the soil. Maybe you aren’t getting any calcium from it. With modern “factory-farming” practices, chances are that most of the commercially grown produce contains very little of the minerals that they are claimed to have. It is not the plants’ fault; they cannot pass along those vital minerals if they are already depleted from the soil. How do those minerals get there, anyway? Oddly enough, it is the natural disasters like rivers flooding, tsunamis and volcanoes erupting that replenish the soil with these life giving minerals. Even though these natural occurrences cause great devastation to land, property, humans and animals, they result in replenished fertile soil for many years. When humans had to live with nature, they learned to accept this. Before our development of modern technology and ingenuity, humans knew to not build their houses on riverbanks and coastal beaches. They knew that ever few years they would get flooded. We now think that we can build where ever we want and can control nature. We think we can keep her rivers and oceans at bay. Well, we have learned time and time again that we cannot. There is a natural order and cycle to this world. We can try to circumvent this natural order with modern synthetic fertilizers and pesticides to yield plentiful crops year after year, but they come with a price. A part of this price is food that looks great, but is devoid of vital life-giving nutrients.

Your motor vehicle IS a weapon

On Tuesday, a man driving an SUV in San Francisco killed one person and injured at least 13 others. As of today, no one really knows why this happened. It was senseless and tragic. An incident like this reminds us how easily one can cause great harm to others while operating a motor vehicle. Just think about it. You are in control of a moving mass of 3000 to 5000 pounds of steel. With almost no effort, you can bring the mass of steel from a standstill to excess of 50 miles an hour in a few seconds. The only difference between an in control vehicle carrying passengers and items from point A to B and total devastation of human lives and property is a small nudge of the steering wheel the wrong way or mistaking the accelerator pedal for the brake. Driving a motor vehicle has as much potential for harm to others as running around with a loaded gun. The Sydney Morning Herald reporting on this particular incident. The police reported that no weapons were found on the individual, but the car had not been searched yet. Hold on here, I think we have missed the obvious: the car IS the weapon! There is no need to search for anything; it is right there in broad daylight. The real difference will probably come down to how this individual is charged and tried (if at all). I bet that if the individual was wielding an automatic gun he would be facing premeditated man slaughter. Since he was operating a vehicle, it probably will not be premeditated and the charges will be much less. While driving a motor vehicle, you don’t need any premeditation to commit murder. You simply flip the steering wheel a bit and accelerate. No one can see it coming until literally the last second. If you see someone running down the street with an Uzi in his hands, you probably at least have a few seconds to dodge out of the way. Anyone driving a motor vehicle can instantly turn from average Joe driver to killer. And your weapon is legal, no background checks. This is part of the price we all pay for the “convenience” of quick and relatively cheap individualistic transportation.

Garden work better than working out at the gym

In this weekend’s newspaper, I read an article titled “Garden work better than working out at the gym”. Hmm…I figure that working around the yard and garden does provide some exercise, but better than the gym? Personally, I do not belong to a gym. I know several people that do. I don’t see anything wrong with that. With the amount of inactivity and obesity in America today, anything to help get those bodies moving is a benefit. The article claims a report shows that many gardening activities parallel the routines of many popular exercises. I would guess that anyone who regularly does any serious work in the garden or yard would agree that you get a good workout. However, what I like best about the article is that it mentions the mental aspect of garden work. It gets you away from the grueling workplace, gets you back in touch with nature. Most people are working in an office or some enclosed structure most of the day. Gardening gives them the opportunity to take a mental break from that, get your hands dirty, touch something real. You also get the nurturing satisfaction from growing plants, fruits or vegetables. These are things you simply cannot get from working out in a gym. Plus, with gardening you have something more to show off than your body.